[x] Play

misterpomp · 8 replies

[x] Play
misterpomp
15 years ago
Jan 30, 2009 - 11:30pm
···
Matt Westwood
15 years ago
Jan 31, 2009 - 2:41pm
I'm easy as long as we're consistent.

If pressed on the subject, I'd prefer "John Doe Plays ..." as long as it's fairly obvious whether the player's name is in the title or not.

Mind, it's not only "plays" that causes the question. It can be ambiguous, in which case it may be safer to have as a blanket rule that the name is *not* in the title, then you can't go wrong.

Having said that, it would utterly confuse the issue to have "Cookin' With" by "The Miles Davis Quintet" or whatever it is.
···
misterpomp
15 years ago
Jan 31, 2009 - 6:30pm
I'm with you on your preference.
···
Mark
13 years ago
Mar 19, 2011 - 3:55am
Let's do it then.
···
scott
13 years ago
Apr 12, 2011 - 1:17am
Did we do it? Those first three don't look changed.
···
Mark
13 years ago
Apr 12, 2011 - 11:55am
I was waiting for someone else to respond enthusiastically but nobody ever did.
···
Python
13 years ago
Apr 12, 2011 - 12:39pm
Yay! Let's do it!!!!
···
Ruiter
13 years ago
Apr 12, 2011 - 1:53pm
Yes, let's be consistent.
···
Mark
13 years ago
May 19, 2011 - 3:51am
I just changed a bunch of these. Some of the other candidates in the database are tough calls, so please post about them in the Shambles forum if you find them.

In a way, we ruled on this issue long ago.

[www.bandtoband.com] :

"I'd say for a general rule of thumb, if the album title graphically includes the band name and also does not make grammatical sense without the band name in it, then include it."

See also [www.bandtoband.com]
© BandToBand.com
Mapping the Rock 'N Roll genome since 2005